Comparing Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Nokian WR G4

Share This Post

The Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Nokian WR G4 have a lot in common, especially since they’re both top picks in the all-weather tire category. This means you can rely on them for top-notch grip whether you’re driving on snow, ice, or during a downpour.

Both tires are marked with the Three Peak Mountain Snowflake (3PMSF) and Mud + Snow (M+S) symbols on their tread, showing they’ve met high standards for severe snow performance. So, if you’re facing tough weather, these tires are your best bet.

Another thing they share is their rated tread life. Both manufacturers promise these tires can last up to 60,000 miles. However, when compared to similarly-priced all-season tires, which often come with longer warranties, they don’t quite match up.

But, despite these similarities, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Nokian WR G4 differ in several aspects. And that’s what we’ll dive into in this article. If you’re deciding between these two for your next tire purchase, stick around till the end of this guide.

Michelin CrossClimate 2

The Michelin CrossClimate 2 is a jack-of-all-trades when it comes to tires. It’s incredibly trustworthy for wet road driving, clings to the pavement in sunny weather, and remains steady and slip-free on snow-covered roads.

So, how does it manage all this? It’s largely thanks to its Thermal Adaptive rubber compound. This special material gets softer in cold temperatures and tougher in the heat, making the tire versatile for both summer and winter driving.

When the cold season hits, the CrossClimate 2 shines with its M+S (Mud and Snow) and 3PMSF (Three-Peak Mountain Snowflake) ratings. These mean the tire has surpassed the standards for handling severe weather, a fact you shouldn’t overlook.

Its year-round effectiveness also comes from the V-shaped grooves in the tread design. These grooves push water away, enhancing resistance to aquaplaning and snow traction. Plus, their sharp design also helps with stability at higher speeds.

However, it’s not without its drawbacks. Its 60,000-mile treadwear warranty is a bit less impressive compared to other all-season tires in its price range, which usually offer longer warranties.

Nokian WR G4

Though not as well-known as the Michelin, the WR G4 is on par in many aspects. It delivers excellent snow and ice traction, high resistance to aquaplaning, and standout performance on dry roads. And it too comes with a 60,000-mile lifespan.

Now in its fourth iteration, the WR G4 especially excels in adverse weather conditions. In rainy weather, it offers short braking distances that set it apart from other all-season tires. On snow and ice, it performs so well you might forget the challenging conditions.

Why trust this review? I’ve personally tested this tire on my SUV 92, switching from a set of winter-specific tires. I had my concerns about its winter capabilities, but the WR G4 proved itself admirably.

However, there is a potential downside for some. During a test on a dry, straight road, I noticed a significant reduction in steering responsiveness. This could be a deal-breaker for those who love an enthusiastic driving experience, as this model might not meet their expectations.

The Main Differences

Now, let’s dive into the nitty-gritty of how the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stacks up against the Nokian WR G4. This comparison will help you decide which tire is the perfect fit for your ride.

Comparing Off-Road Performance

First off, I’ve got to say, if you’re looking to tackle the wild, bumpy off-roads, neither of these tires would be my first pick.

Here’s why: both tires are made from a rubber compound that’s just too soft for the rough and tumble of off-roading. Their sidewalls aren’t beefy enough to fend off the cuts, punctures, and other battle scars that come with the territory.

And when it comes to design? They’re missing those key features—like deep grooves and aggressive lugs—that make a tire sturdy and reliable off the beaten path. I could pile on more reasons these tires aren’t cut out for off-roading, but you probably get the picture.

For those of you who love to venture into the wild or deal with tough terrains regularly, consider mud-terrain tires. They’re your best bet for keeping safe on those off-road adventures.

Winner: It’s a tie

Comparing On-Road Performance

How Do They Perform in Dry Conditions?

Now, you might find it hard to believe, but the WR G4 actually takes the lead on dry roads.

For the everyday driver, this difference might seem minor. But tests show the WR G4 has a 6% better grip on dry surfaces than the CrossClimate 2.

For the driving enthusiasts who love to push their cars to the limit, this extra grip means sharper handling, the ability to take corners at speed, and shorter stopping distances—potentially making a huge difference in emergency situations.

So, for those looking to boost their driving game, the Nokian WR G4 is the way to go.

Winner: Nokian WR G4

How Do They Perform on Wet Roads?

The WR G4 takes the lead in wet road performance. While drivers have reported that the CrossClimate 2 may experience significant understeer when challenged on wet surfaces, it’s disappointing since it scores well in other areas of wet performance like resistance to hydroplaning, braking distances, and traction.

When we look at the WR G4, its wet grip is exceptional, almost matching its dry performance. It also boasts strong resistance to aquaplaning in various wet conditions such as standing water and heavy rain.

So, if you often find yourself driving in the rain, the WR G4 could be the smarter option.

Winner: Nokian WR G4

Are They Good in the Handling Department?

The CrossClimate 2 shines in handling, making it a favorite among our readers. Its responsiveness to steering inputs is lightning-fast, allowing for quick lane changes. It also remains predictable and stable during cornering, especially on drier roads.

The tire also excels in providing feedback to the driver. While the WR G4 doesn’t fall short in steering feel, feedback from drivers who have tested both suggests the CrossClimate 2 offers a more responsive experience.

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2

Comparing on Snow Performance

Both tires proudly carry the Three Peak Mountain Snowflake symbol and the M+S emblem, featuring a tread compound that stays flexible in cold weather. Their design includes biting edges and grooves that help maintain stability on snow-covered roads. On ice, they both manage to provide good traction and keep braking distances short enough to be considered safe, while also resisting aquaplaning effectively.

Winner: It’s a tie

Comparing on Treadwear and Durability

Despite both tires offering a 60,000-mile treadwear warranty, the CrossClimate 2 edges out in durability. This is particularly true for drivers frequently navigating harsh winter conditions, where the WR G4 may wear down quicker. Both heavy and light vehicle owners have noted the CrossClimate 2’s lower wear rate.

Winner: CrossClimate 2

Comparing on Comfort

The CrossClimate 2 beats the WR G4 when it comes to a smooth ride.

It even outperforms its own predecessor, known for its plush feel, by smoothing out bumps and dips in the road like a pro. The rubber of this tire is great at soaking up vibrations, keeping the ride quality high.

Noise levels with the CrossClimate 2 are impressively low, too. Sure, as the tread gets thinner, some noise might sneak in, but let’s be honest – that’s a common trait for all tires as they wear down.

Winner: CrossClimate 2

Comparing on Price

It’s no shock that the CrossClimate 2 comes with a higher price tag than the WR G4.

Looking at the numbers, the starting price for the CrossClimate 2 is $173.99 at Simple Tire, while you can snag the WR G4 for $157.34. If saving some cash is high on your list, then the WR G4 stands out as the go-to choice.

Winner: Nokian WR G4

Pros and Cons

While these two tires share many features, they each have their unique strengths and drawbacks.

Michelin CrossClimate 2 Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Features M+S and 3PMSF symbols for superior all-weather capability.
  • Ensures a quiet and comfortable ride, enhancing your driving experience.
  • Provides better steering feedback, making driving more enjoyable.

Cons:

  • Comes with a higher price tag, which might not fit everyone’s budget.

Nokian WR G4 Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Offers short stopping distances on wet roads, increasing safety.
  • Performs well on snow- and ice-covered surfaces, ensuring reliability in winter conditions.
  • More affordable than the CrossClimate 2, making it a budget-friendly option.

Cons:

  • Lacks responsiveness, which might affect the driving experience for some.

Which Tire Should You Choose?

Consider the Michelin CrossClimate 2 if you prioritize:

  • A quiet and comfortable drive that makes every journey more pleasant.
  • Enhanced steering response for a more engaging driving experience.
  • Durable tread life that promises longevity and value.

On the other hand, the Nokian WR G4 might be your go-to if you:

  • Want to save money without significantly compromising on quality.
  • Need reliable performance on wet surfaces and in snowy or icy conditions.
  • Don’t require high steering feedback for your driving style.

Both tires offer exceptional snow and ice traction, as well as impressive wet road performance comparable to premium all-season tires. So, if you’re in a region with challenging weather conditions for much of the year, both options are worth considering.

Lucas Liam

Lucas Liam

Hi, I'm Liam, the enthusiast behind Off Road Genius. With more than 10 years of conquering diverse terrains, my experience with Jeeps extends beyond the ordinary. I've mastered the intricate details of these off-road champions, pushing their capabilities to the limit. Through this platform, I share my profound knowledge and lessons learned from countless miles on the trail. I'm here to inspire, educate, and guide you through the thrilling world of Jeeps. So, buckle up for this adventure-filled ride!

Learn More about the best jeep accessories